“Attention aux charlatans !”
"Beware of charlatans!"
— France Info, July 29, 2025
That is how a recent France Info article opens—one that aims to debunk what it calls the “pseudo-theories” of ancestral trauma and epigenetics-based healing. The tone is not only dismissive, but derisive. And while skepticism is warranted when anyone promises miracle cures or simplified solutions, this particular piece commits the very sin it denounces: oversimplification.
It is one thing to caution against unqualified practitioners. It is another to erase emerging science, distort metaphysical frameworks, and ridicule thousands of people’s lived healing journeys because they do not fit a 20th-century paradigm.
As a health psychologist and consciousness-based practitioner, I find this debate worth revisiting—not to defend magical thinking, but to clarify the terrain.
Here is what the journalist presents:
“Il suffit d’aller sur internet pour trouver… une femme prétendant savoir d’où vient l’endométriose… Elle peut venir d’autres vies et du transgénérationnel… je porte des traumas pour mes lignées… pour des lignées de femmes.”
"Just go online and you will quickly find a woman claiming to know the origin of endometriosis… She says it can come from past lives and ancestral trauma… that she carries trauma for her family lines, especially for lines of women."
This summary is presented mockingly—as if even the possibility of ancestral trauma were inherently absurd. The piece continues:
“C’est séduisant, mais impossible, contredit la science.”
"It may sound appealing, but it is impossible, science says."
Impossible? That is a bold word for a field as dynamic as epigenetics.
Let us clarify. Epigenetics is the study of how environmental influences can affect gene expression—sometimes with effects that persist beyond one generation. Studies in mice have shown that trauma-related responses (such as fear conditioning) can be passed down epigenetically. Human studies, such as those on descendants of Holocaust survivors or victims of famine (e.g., the Dutch Hunger Winter), suggest similar patterns—altered stress responses, hormone profiles, or methylation markers that correlate with ancestral trauma exposure [1–3].
Yet the article dismisses these nuances with this quote:
“La science a montré… un effacement épigénétique… une reprogrammation quasi complète.”
"Science has shown… an epigenetic erasure… a nearly complete reprogramming."
That is only partially true. Yes, reprogramming occurs at conception—but studies suggest that not all epigenetic markers are erased. Some escape that reset and may influence early development. The field is still evolving, and the presence of epigenetic persistence is debated—but certainly not disproven.
The article implies a dangerous dichotomy: either something has a known molecular mechanism, or it is meaningless. That worldview collapses under its own rigidity.
Here is one particularly telling argument:
“Pourquoi l’endométriose serait-elle précisément la conséquence de la fausse couche de cette arrière-grand-mère, et pas d’un traumatisme vécu par un des 13 autres ancêtres, et des hommes par exemple ?”
"Why would endometriosis be specifically the result of a miscarriage experienced by the great-grandmother, and not by one of the other 13 ancestors—some of whom were men?"
This question is posed to mock the logic of ancestral trauma—but ironically, it reveals a mechanistic misunderstanding. Memory—whether genetic, symbolic, or vibrational—is not linear. It is field-based. Certain stories surface not because of clear lineages, but because conditions—emotional, energetic, or biological—ripen. This is not random. It is resonant.
From a multidimensional perspective, what we inherit is not just biology—but tone, archetype, unfinished emotional charge. Some of what is called “ancestral trauma” may not be trauma in the clinical sense, or ancestral in the genealogical one.
It may be resonance.
It may be a symbolic activation encoded in the Oversoul’s larger journey.
It may be that your womb—if you are a woman with endometriosis—has become the stage for an unresolved feminine wound not of your own making, but still aching to be seen.
Science cannot measure that. But healing can reveal it [4–5].
Let me be clear:
But in the therapeutic setting, I have seen again and again how patterns emerge—not as fact, but as invitation. A phobia that maps onto a historical era. A chronic tension that lifts after symbolic release. A body that speaks what the conscious mind cannot yet say.
The point is not to prove that your ancestor’s miscarriage caused your illness. The point is to listen differently—to understand that the body speaks in riddles, in metaphors, and sometimes in echoes [6].
The France Info article warns readers:
“Fuyez ces idées séduisantes et faciles à comprendre… ces charlatans vont surtout vider votre compte en banque.”
"Flee from these seductive and easy-to-grasp ideas… these charlatans will mostly just drain your bank account."
Here is my counter-warning:
Beware not just of false hope—but of flat frameworks. Healing requires nuance. Not absolutism. Not dogma disguised as skepticism.
You do not need to believe in past lives, resonance fields, or archetypes to understand this: Healing is a dialogue. Between the body, the psyche, the field. Between now and before. Between what is conscious and what is not.
Science is catching up. But until it does, do not let a flat headline silence the whisper of insight.
You are not carrying your ancestor’s wound because of superstition.
You are remembering it because the time to resolve it may be now.
Sophie Guellati-Salcedo, Ph.D.
Telehealth Services via Zoom - Practice based in Miami, Florida
Start your journey toward clarity and coherence—mentally, emotionally, physically, and spiritually.
✨ Click below to access The Daily Terrain Reset, my multidimensional 5-step self-alignment guide.